From the Dark Stream

Nothing is the Way it Seems to Be...

 

I know a thing or two about a thing or two...

2008/1/29

Presidential Candidates For A North American Union

Tags:
@ 01:23 AM (3 months, 18 days ago)

Watch this real close, Elmer. Then you might understand the reality of the NAU & NWO you gafaw at.

ABOUT THIS VIDEO:

The following video exposes the North American Union and the Council on Foreign Relations involvement.
Our world is about to change...

This past August, the presidents of Mexico, Canada and the U.S., met to discuss The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.
You may ask yourself why you've never heard of it...

The goal of this "partnership" is to integrate these countries economically and politically, with plans to mint a new universal currency called the "Amero".
In other words a "North American Union". A super-state in which U.S. sovereignty is diminished.

Even CNN news anchor Lou Dobbs has criticized it saying it's "absolute ignorance... an absolute contravention of our law, of our Constitution, every national value".

The only trouble is, who you plan to elect to the presidency could make matters worse...

Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, John Edwards, Joe Biden, Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Mitt Romney and John McCain are all members of The Council on Foreign Relations.
For those of you who are not familiar with this organization, it's stated goal is to "influence" American public opinion in regards to foreign policy.
Many of the largest corporations in the world are also members of this elite organization.

The CFR is responsible for releasing a document entitled, "Building a North American Community", which has been cited as the inspiration and road map for the Security and Prosperity Partnership.

ALL of these candidates support The Patriot Act, Military Commisions Act, and The Real I.D. Act.

The Military Commisions Act allows for U.S. citizens to be labeled as "enemy combatants" and held indefinitely without access to an attorney.
It also allows you to be tortured up to the point of "physical and mental trauma".




The Real I.D. Act requires that all americans get a national I.D. card outfitted with a Radio Frequency Identification Chip (RFID) by 2009, beginning May 2008.

Halliburton subsidiary KBR has been contracted by the U.S. Army Corps. of Engineers to build detention centers for "an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs".
One wonders what "new programs" they have in mind...

To vote for one of these canidates is to tighten a noose around American sovereignty.
To elect one of these canidates is to elect an unaccountable, governing body to "guide" our nation into one world government.
If you want a president who'll be a puppet for the elite class, who'll be no different than George W. himself, then vote for one of those above.
If you want to live in a fascist, totalitarian super-state, then by all means elect one of those.

However...
Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate who has expressed grave concerns over these recent developments, and the ONLY one determined to stop them!

I will vote for a true patriot.

LEGALIZE THE CONSTITUTION!! VOTE FOR RON PAUL!!

 

Comment(s) »

  1. good 1 ....will put it as a link ...

    Comment by aza spade— 2008/01/29 @ 05:54 AM — (Reply)

  2. Hey it sounds exactly like what is decribed in revelations, Only Revelations is not this decriptive saying mostly that NO MAN MAY BUY OR SELL SAVE HE WHO HAS THE MARK OF THE BEAST IMPRINTED (IMPLANTED) UPON HIS FOREHEAD OR HAND SOUNDS CLOSE ENOUGH THAT I AM THINKING OF ITS POTENTIAL as "BIBLICAL PHROPHESY FULLFILLED" !

    Comment by aza spade— 2008/01/31 @ 03:32 PM — (Reply)

  3. You could be putting the Congressman's life in danger by continuing to expose this stuff.

    Ed

    Comment by Ed— 2008/01/29 @ 05:56 AM — (Reply)

  4. So you admit it is real, then? Just don't care? What?

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 07:49 AM — (Reply)

  5. "LINKED" ......

    Comment by aza spade— 2008/01/29 @ 06:09 AM — (Reply)

  6. Spread the word, Aza!

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 07:51 AM — (Reply)

  7. I suggest all you all stop being jackals and laughing hyenias trying to screw with me simply because I feel passionately about the country's need for RP - and join the rEVOLution while you still can - or you're gonna wake up one day with a chip in your ass and a neighbor named Pedro. The Time is really now or never!

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 08:11 AM — (Reply)

  8. I suggest all you all stop being jackals and laughing hyenias trying to screw with me simply because I feel passionately about the country's need for RP - and join the rEVOLution while you still can - or you're gonna wake up one day with a chip in your ass and a neighbor named Pedro. The Time is really now or never!

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 08:11 AM — (Reply)

  9. you have something against people named Pedro?

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/30 @ 04:51 PM — (Reply)

  10. You could be putting the Congressman's life in danger by continuing to expose this stuff.

    Ed


    That's why Congressman Paul is a real patriot, Ed. He knows what he's up against.
    What about my life, Ed?
    Isn't your life worth believing in something, Ed?
    Or are you just gonna sit there? Waiting for everything you don't want to see happen to unfold on you?

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 09:03 AM — (Reply)

  11. Were you able to catch this one, Elmer?

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 01:25 PM — (Reply)

  12. Still coming up with some spin, I imagine.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 06:52 PM — (Reply)

  13. This is the scariest real conspiracy going - cause it's about to happen! Can't refute this one, huh, Elmer? I thought all the conspiracies were kooky lies?
    Guess what? Knowing what you now know after watching this video - if you vote for anyone but Ron Paul, you are nothing less than a Benedict Arnold. Think about it. It's very true. You're either with the rEVOLution - or your a traitor who backs the CFR's vision of a NAU.
    Be a big enough man to admit when you're wrong, be a real patriot, and start spreading the word before your beloved country is gone.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 07:42 PM — (Reply)

  14. What I wonder is if Elmer is a smaller man than I gave him credit for?

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 09:45 PM — (Reply)

  15. Unbelievably, I win one without so much as a word.
    There is no defense - the documents exist that prove the CFR wants to end our nation in favor of a North American Union - and EVERY candidate but Ron Paul is a member of the CFR!
    = All Candidates (except Ron Paul)are TRAITORS!
    You can go look it up on their site and verify all of it. They have it there for all the world to see - the video tells you exactly where to look.

    Elmer, The Dark Side of Bohemian Grove video shows exactly what kind of people we are really dealing with. They are very evil people capable of anything. Unfortunately, I'm afraid you are gonna find out I'm right about this one - probably sooner than later.
    But I just want you to remember - and watch and see how the story is spun to meet the agenda. The probable false flag and or manufactured dollar crash events that the controlled media will harp on as a way to make it happen.
    These are the most powerful people in the world - they're not going to go away or stop trying for this no matter what. The Ron Paul rEVOLution is the only peaceful hope.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 10:14 PM — (Reply)

  16. I hate to break it to you Dugg...but Elmer MIGHT have been ignoring you.

    :razz: Ed

    Comment by Ed— 2008/01/29 @ 10:26 PM — (Reply)

  17. Yeah, wonder why? He hasn't been ignoring my other thread all night.

    One last thing, Elmer, RP being the one candidate who's not CFR controlled - does that answer your question as to why he gets blacked out of the controlled media? You don't think I can find 1000 articles about it on the internet but nobody at FOX or ABC or wherever knows about it, right? Uh, huh. The media is an accomplice in murdering our country.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 10:53 PM — (Reply)

  18. Hey, Ron Paul is a Freemason - You are a traitor and people like you are the reason.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/29 @ 11:08 PM — (Reply)

  19. the answers to all of life's questions can be found on the internet (you do know that the queen of england is the anti-Christ???) and the number of links gives no credence to their veracity

    I thought you were smarter than that

    you should really attend some college courses...you're wasting that high IQ pittling around on the internet all day

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/29 @ 11:19 PM — (Reply)

  20. That's the best you got, Elmer? To try an insult my intelligence? Let me tell ya something, just because there's a lie in a book doesn't make all books lies. Your logic is wanting. The rest of the internet has no bearing on this story. It is easily verifiable - The CFR's own website contains the articles in question and lists the membership of all the candidates.
    You know what that means, right? You're wrong about everything. I've proven (without insult, name calling, or slander)that the people you support are traitors who want an end to American sovereignty. Their wars are lies meant to bankrupt us.
    Since you have zero defense all you can sadly do is try and feebly attack the message - instead of taking the opportunity to pull your head out of your ass.
    I thought you were a big enough guy to admit when you were obviously wrong, Elmer. Guess I was wrong about you.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/30 @ 07:12 AM — (Reply)

  21. Proven? About 99.9% of what you post is either not independently verified, mischaracterized, misinterpretatons, taken out of context or just outright lies...after proving your wrong SO many times there's really no point in continuing to lead the horse to water

    Do you still fly on airplanes? Do you use a phone? cell phone? obviously you use the internet...

    and it wasn't meant as an insult, I meant it....you're smarter than these bozos you quote

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/30 @ 12:31 PM — (Reply)

  22. We're talking about this PROVEN and verifiable issue. I challenge you to find anything on this blog that could be called an outright lie. Even one thing. I'm still waiting for you to prove me wrong just once - on ANY issue.
    AND I'm still waiting for your spin on this issue. How do you justify all the candidates that the media backs being part of an organization that calls for the end of American sovereignty? How do you justify your support of any of these candidates? Do you support the CFR, Elmer? Apparently you do, at least unwittingly. Go figure.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/30 @ 01:21 PM — (Reply)

  23. You think a youtube video proves your point, need I say more? Larry Gunderson....hmmmm the guy wasn't in the FBI in 1993 for one....Larry Gunderson is a proven liar yet he's your source for proving what? you haven't proven the media is controlled by a 'jewish' conspiracy...shall I go on

    You never answer any of the questions I bring up...you simply attribute them to as yet some conspircacy in the sky

    I'll reiterate my former statement to show your folly about the FBI:

    So to summarize, a group that was being funded, and only just at that, from various Iranian and Egyptian sources started to build a bomb. One of their group became an FBI informant and was paid to supervise the progress and report what was happening. A plan was hatched to raid the apartment and substitute the explosives the group had with fake stuff, but after it leaked to the group it was cancelled, and the informant was deemed unreliable, so was cut off and since he wasn't being paid any longer stopped informing. Subsequently the bomb was finished in a unknown location, and set off at the WTC. 6 months after having cut him off, and being proven horribly wrong (through hindsight) the FBI rehired the informant, but three weeks in they were still paying silly buggers with his funding which started to place the new investigation he was informing for into jeopardy. As a result he taped the conversations and made it clear that he was worried that this operation was going the same way as the last, resulting in the FBI finally paying up and giving him money that when all totalled up with what he'd already been paid came to 1.5 million dollars.


    Ummm smell the lie in what you're saying Dugg? Yet you and your buddies charactierize it differently because it feeds your need for a conspiracy. It's still a lie.

    Did I miss anything?

    So what we have here is a total cock-up by the FBI because they didn't trust an informant and decided that he was just ripping them off and passing on bogus info, then being proven wrong in the worst possible way. Apart from their being a bunch of incompetent ignoramuses that should have been fired, how exactly did the FBI actually help the bombers other then not believing Salem that they were a real threat?


    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/30 @ 04:47 PM — (Reply)

  24. Mr Straw Dog - C F R. Do you or do you not have an opinion? You slandering me over the use of a video would be like me ridiculing you for linking to an article.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/30 @ 06:14 PM — (Reply)

  25. here's a taste of your logic (hypothetically speaking)

    Dugg is gay. He's gay because I said so and if he says he's not he's a liar because he's a freemason/illuminati jewish media controller.

    any attempts on dugg's part to deny he's gay is just a lie. you can't trust anyone who's part of the CFR, he wouldn't tell me the truth anyway.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/30 @ 09:02 PM — (Reply)

  26. Still no answer. :lol:

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 07:20 AM — (Reply)

  27. As I recall Dugg, you have a lovely wife and your alter ego Mos has assured bloghi.com readers that you are probably not gay.

    :razz: Ed

    Comment by Ed— 2008/01/31 @ 07:28 AM — (Reply)

  28. Mos is hardly my alter ego.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 07:54 AM — (Reply)

  29. No. You're arguement is totally flawed once again. In THEIR OWN WORDS ELMER - they want an end to American sovereignty. They want world government. So how exactly is that a case of me just saying something about someone?

    You've sunk to lows I didn't think you'd stoop to with your provocations, name calling, and outright slander in an effort to prove yourself right over an indefensable issue. And you have yet to answer the question. Do you support the CFR, Elmer?

    BTW I'm not gay, Elmer.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/30 @ 10:00 PM — (Reply)

  30. why should I trust you to tell me the truth? Sure you're not gay.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/30 @ 10:53 PM — (Reply)

  31. I've debated you fairly, honestly, backed up everything - including with YOUR kind of sources like CBS, haven't called you names and have shown you exactly where to get the information. You have used tactics befitting a 10th grader and have shown your true self and general lack of character. All you have been able to rebuttal me with are insults and accusations.
    Here's one for you - you're an ignorant asshole. Stop wasting my time. My opinions fly right over your head. You have no idea how to debate and less of an idea how to be cool. You've never answered the question and were totally smoked, schooled and owned. You would rather support traitors than admit you are wrong and your not big enough to apologize or admit defeat when bested. In short - you are a fake patriot wrapped in platitudes and flag waving - and warpigs like you are the ones who live in fear and gave away our country.
    I hope everyone who ever comes to bloghi sees these strings and what an asshole you are.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/30 @ 11:06 PM — (Reply)

  32. Dude I've done nothing but ask you questions that you have not answered all week.

    as far as name calling etc. It's a taste of your own medicine...

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/30 @ 10:58 PM — (Reply)

  33. Answered all of them. You just refuse to listen. Gave you links & quotes you won't read. I think you sniffed too much DU that you think is good for you.:lol:

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 07:16 AM — (Reply)

  34. Name calling? When? Twisting a politicians name isn't the same as calling you a fag. I'd kick your ass if you were standing here. My hands are deadly weapons, Elmo - but since I can't get them around your warpig neck - I'll keep destroying your lies.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 07:19 AM — (Reply)

  35. The question Dugg is who is THEY and what do THEY want to accomplish. Really accomplish....not just some generalizations.

    Ed

    Comment by Ed— 2008/01/30 @ 10:06 PM — (Reply)

  36. I think I've made it clear - the THEY is the CFR - what they want is a NWO with one world government. They've stated it. They're laid the groundwork - and they've got all the candidates in their bag - but one.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/30 @ 10:53 PM — (Reply)

  37. THEIR OWN WORDS ELMER

    Then post their own words from a reliable source without the conspiracy spin and we'll talk.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/30 @ 11:05 PM — (Reply)

  38. Since your too lazy to watch the 3 minute video I already posted - What do you say to this, Einstein? Guess they're lying about what they want to do, huh?

    CFR Quotes
    "The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is the American Branch of a society which originated in England... (and) ...believes national boundaries should be obliterated and one-world rule established."
    - Carroll Quigley, member of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), mentor to Bill Clinton

    CFR Quotes
    "Once the ruling members of the CFR shadow government have decided that the U.S. Government should adopt a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of (the) CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy, and to confound and discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition."
    - Admiral Chester Ward, former CFR member and Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy

    CFR Quotes
    "The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is promoting the disarmament of U.S. sovereignty and national independence and submergence into an all powerful, one world government."
    - Admiral Chester Ward, former CFR member and Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 10:12 AM — (Reply)

  39. People said that about the UN back in the day Dugg. So far I have not received an investment statement calulated in Euros. To follow up on Ed's question, what is it that you think THEY are actually trying to do? It appears that you think THEY are trying to hurt you. What are THEY trying to do to you personally?

    Comment by Barry G.— 2008/01/30 @ 11:08 PM — (Reply)

  40. Just watch the 3 short videos i posted and it should be obvious to you. For God sake, Why? I give up.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/30 @ 11:11 PM — (Reply)

  41. Yeah, but the big difference there, Barry, is the UN wasn't flat out saying and drawing up public plans that called for the end of the USA - the CFR is. Do you think it's right that Presidential Candidates should belong to a group that calls for this?

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 10:17 AM — (Reply)

  42. How about their own website!!!@! I've been telling you from the start! Did you even watch the Fn videos?! Obviously not - would rather just attack. Your idiots.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/30 @ 11:10 PM — (Reply)

  43. not you Barry.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/30 @ 11:10 PM — (Reply)

  44. A point of clarification Dugg. You do know the photos in your sidebar and sticky post aren't real I hope. I think the term of art currently in vogue is "photoshopped".

    BG

    Comment by Barry G.— 2008/01/30 @ 11:10 PM — (Reply)

  45. I don't remember ever saying they were real...:?:

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 10:18 AM — (Reply)

  46. Gee thanks Dugg. I don't think you are an idiot either.

    :lol: BG

    Comment by Barry G.— 2008/01/30 @ 11:12 PM — (Reply)

  47. Dugg, you haven't convinced me you're not gay.
    Convince me. Your logic is illogical.
    By the way, you can ban me, but since I'm a card carrying CFR, Jewish media lover, you're stuck with me. we have our ways, Dugg. Be afraid, Dugg, be very afraid!!
    neener, neener, neeeeeener!!!

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/31 @ 12:39 AM — (Reply)

  48. Your intellect shines through, Elmer. It doesn't surprise me that you would force your way into somewhere where your not wanted - just like your traitor heroes. Go away, Elmer.

    BTW - I have 4 kids and a wife - but don't let reason convince you - it doesn't on any other topic.

    hahahahahah Elmer, the sham patriot who likes to piously wrap himself in a flag while he calls for murder and DU warcrimes. hahahahaahahaahhahahahahahahahahahahahaha You'll find out in the end Elmo.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 07:13 AM — (Reply)

  49. Gee whiz boys. I go out of town for a day, to picket Hillary, and you guys can't play nice in the sandbox. Dugg....you didn't try to ban your pal Elmer did you? Ron Paul would never condone suppression of free speech. Give him another chance.

    Ed

    Comment by Ed— 2008/01/31 @ 07:31 AM — (Reply)

  50. Yeah. I tried to be polite cause he acts like he'll cry if I call someone a dumbass - and then he proceeds to call me a liar, nut and fag - despite the fact I have NEVER called him names and only wanted a real conversation. He never answered the question, either. I showed him that he backs the viewpoint of traitors and he can't deny it so like a cornered animal he started throwing insults.
    Why exactly would I want him on my page? As you can see, he forces his way in where he's not wanted any way.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 10:26 AM — (Reply)

  51. Hey, Ed...you're right. I'm banned. Worked like a charm, didn't it? Dugg, forget the gay thing, it was said to make a point. If you're going to be a Ron Paul fan, dugg,you're going to have to have a thicker skin, don't you think?
    See you later!

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/31 @ 07:40 AM — (Reply)

  52. Your point was proved all right. I give you direct quotes and the CFR official site that has the articles I'm talking about - instead of any intelligent debate or conversation you opt to call me a liar, a nut and a fag. A month from now when your acting like an idiot again you will proclaim that you told me how it was and schooled me - - but the fact is you've answered nothing, were proved wrong, and were a totally out of line asshole.
    All Bush supporters are ignorant warpigs - point proved.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 08:01 AM — (Reply)

  53. Well, A lot of talk went on. It was/is ALL interesting. Some points scored by both going both ways at times which shows that there is something to this "BLOG'O SPHERE" and not with standing the "ESTEE LAUDER ADVERTIZEMENTS" A very good "SPIRITED" debate did take place ! Debate which could be very informative and help in the coming months as we make a decision on who to put in the "WHITEHOUSE" ....

    Comment by aza spade— 2008/01/31 @ 09:50 AM — (Reply)

  54. I dont want to see America's soveinty go by way of the "DODO BIRD" but somehow te world will change....and NOT neccesasily for the good ! But as it changes there is a possibility that ALL the world is speeding into a future that will bring about the changes needed to bring about the "END" ! Just as GOD WANTS IT TO ! NO MYSTERY THERE, The end will come about as GOD shows ALL people that he did build (create) U.S. and when it suites him ALL will be made "RIGHT AS RAIN" on the day of his choosing. So as many continue the "DABATE" and directions will come and go just as "POPULAR OPINION" will. ME ???? I will continue to complain about the forces that keep me "DOWN" and complain about the other things that piss me off !!! AND PRAY FOR MY BRETHREN WHO ARE HERE ...

    Comment by aza spade— 2008/01/31 @ 10:03 AM — (Reply)

  55. I agree, Aza. I got a good feeling where we're headed - just trying to wake a few imbeciles up to it so they can stop being sheople before it's too late.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 10:30 AM — (Reply)

  56. Hey Dugg, wazzup ?? I liked watching the 2 of you "DEBATE' as it was stimulating to see that as the debate progressed it was covering ground that should be out in the open. Concerning how "WE PEOPLE" are being used very openly, Notwithstanding the reality and the sublime. There are people out there that have agendas and are all about trying to make the world a comffy place to live. BUT .. that will never happen because humans are too wide a range of "VARIBLES" so when someone thinks they have it fiqured out "UP POPS" the VARIBLE, The "JOKER" if you will. The fly in the ointment. You know, The 2 of you should probably have your own internet "DEBATE CHANNEL" ...such as the likes of Hannity and Colms (check spelling) ... It could lead somewhere ???? RELAVENT PERHAPS ...

    Comment by aza spade— 2008/01/31 @ 11:56 AM — (Reply)

  57. Thanks, Aza. I'd love that, but Elmer would get so much hate mail he probably couldn't take it.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 12:18 PM — (Reply)

  58. Hey EB and Dugg. What is it with you guys? Can't we all just get along?

    Unban the poor guy Dugg. If all of us go around banning each other, pretty soon we'll be just like Hillary.

    :lol: BG

    Comment by Barry G.— 2008/01/31 @ 12:35 PM — (Reply)

  59. OHHHHH NO HILLARY !

    Comment by aza spade— 2008/01/31 @ 12:50 PM — (Reply)

  60. I'll repost my previous answer - and then everyone can see what an asshole Elmer actually is. Watch the video if you haven't and you'll know the deal.

    Yeah. I tried to be polite cause he acts like he'll cry if I call someone a dumbass - and then he proceeds to call me a liar, nut and fag - despite the fact I have NEVER called him names and only wanted a real conversation. He never answered the question, either. I showed him that he backs the viewpoint of traitors and he can't deny it so like a cornered animal he started throwing insults.
    Why exactly would I want him on my page? As you can see, he forces his way in where he's not wanted any way.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 05:33 PM — (Reply)

  61. Golly gee Batman, what the hell is going on?

    :shock: Ed

    Comment by Ed— 2008/01/31 @ 06:20 PM — (Reply)

  62. Ed, Batman's not feeling too happy these days. Couldn't be because ol' Ron Paul's not going to be president, could it?
    Here's a guy who'd rather split the conservative vote at the most dangerous time probably in the history of this country (with the possible appointment of 2 Supreme Court Justices in the next four years in a probable atmosphere of a Dem Pres with a highly Dem Congress!), rather than work hard within the Republican party to affect change, making sure that at least the main things most Republicans are interested in (terror security, low taxes and good immigration policy) are implemented? Man, sometimes you've gotta wonder, huh?

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/31 @ 08:18 PM — (Reply)

  63. I'm hoping that Ginsberg and Stevens will be dead or institutionalized in time for President Bush to replace their sorry asses. I think when the time comes, Dugg will get on board with the right candidate. Congressman Paul has made it clear that he will not do anything to hurt and will support the Republican nominee. Correct Dugg?

    Ed

    Comment by Ed— 2008/01/31 @ 08:33 PM — (Reply)

  64. No. He has principals and says he couldn't support any of them - nor would I.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 11:09 PM — (Reply)

  65. Ed, Batman's not feeling too happy these days. Couldn't be because ol' Ron Paul's not going to be president, could it?
    Here's a guy who'd rather split the conservative vote at the most dangerous time probably in the history of this country (with the possible appointment of 2 Supreme Court Justices in the next four years in a probable atmosphere of a Dem Pres with a highly Dem Congress!), rather than work hard within the Republican party to affect change, making sure that at least the main things most Republicans are interested in (terror security, low taxes and good immigration policy) are implemented? Man, sometimes you've gotta wonder, huh?

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2008/01/31 @ 09:48 PM — (Reply)

  66. You got it all wrong . As fuckin usual. It's good to know I can count on some things never changing. Sun comes up, government lies, Elmer's wrong...
    Here's the reality - Ron Paul has the balls to stand up against the controlled media and all the CFR puppet candidates and get crucified for simply telling the truth. It may be true that he can't win the nomination - but none of your warpigs will have enough delegates either. That means a brokered convention - and ANYTHING could happen then. It's sorta like the Giants. Nobody expects them to win but they're gonna show up - and they do have a chance.
    You never know what could happen, Elmo.

    Comment by Dugg— 2008/01/31 @ 11:18 PM — (Reply)

  67. Paul Mall who? Does this guy Ron smoke? Is that what this blog is about?

    Comment by Kermit— 2008/02/04 @ 11:53 AM — (Reply)

  68. Say what Elmer?

    Ed

    Comment by Ed— 2008/01/31 @ 09:54 PM — (Reply)

  69. Looks like ron Paul Mall got smoked

    Comment by Achphlemmed— 2008/02/06 @ 01:35 AM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are over 25 comments to this post, your eventual comment will no longer trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically